WASHINGTON — The U.S. House took a broadly bipartisan vote Wednesday night on the debt limit package, sending it to the U.S. Senate where lawmakers are expected to vote quickly to clear the measure.
The bill would suspend the nation’s borrowing limit through Jan. 1, 2025 and set caps on discretionary spending for two years. It would also make changes to work requirements on some federal safety net programs and overhaul aspects of the energy permitting process. The House approved the bill following a 314-117 vote.
While members of both political parties broadly backed the legislation, they each criticized the compromises negotiators made to broker an agreement.
North Carolina Rep. Patrick McHenry, one of the Republican negotiators who brokered the deal, said the bill was the product of a “long, laborious and tough” process.
The measure, he said, is the “most conservative spending package” he’s voted on during his time in Congress, though he noted it’s a product of divided government where the GOP controls the House while Democrats control the Senate and White House.
“This rates as one of the largest deficit reduction bills in American history and it will fundamentally change the spending trajectory here in Washington — with more work to do and more work ahead,” McHenry said.
Washington Democratic Rep. Suzan DelBene said that while the “deal is far from perfect” lawmakers “can’t let perfect be the enemy of the good when the stakes are this high.”
The agreement, she said, would shield veterans, senior citizens, law enforcement and schools from the more severe budget cuts that Republicans proposed in their original debt limit bill.
“This deal will protect American families and our economy from a devastating default on our nations’ bills in just five days,” DelBene said.
“Compromise means that no one gets everything they want, so we have a choice between a catastrophic outcome or a chance to move forward with a bipartisan compromise,” she added later.
New Jersey Democratic Rep. Bill Pascrell criticized Republicans for ruling out all changes to the tax code during negotiations and for rescinding some money to boost the Internal Revenue Service’s budget.
“We want to make sure everybody pays their fair share — what in God’s name is wrong with that,” Pascrell said.
If Congress doesn’t update the tax code, Pascrell said, lawmakers haven’t done their jobs.
The package would set federal spending at $886 billion for defense and $704 billion for nondefense during the fiscal year slated to begin Oct. 1. The following year, fiscal 2025, it would cap defense spending at $895 billion for defense and $711 billion for nondefense.
The 100-page bill holds numerous additional provisions, including changes to how the federal government permits energy projects as well as language to claw back $28 billion in COVID-19 funds and about $2 billion in funding for the Internal Revenue Service.
The measure would make changes to work requirements for the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families program and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program.
The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office’s assessment of the legislation says the package’s provisions on discretionary spending would reduce outlays by $1.332 trillion during the next decade.
Clawing back some of the $80 billion in funding that Democrats included for the Internal Revenue Service in their signature climate change, healthcare and tax package known as the Inflation Reduction Act, or IRA, would actually increase the deficit during the next decade, according to CBO.
CBO Director Phillip Swagel wrote the cut to IRS funding would decrease spending “by $1.4 billion and decrease revenues by $2.3 billion over the 2023–2033 period, resulting in a net increase in the deficit of $900 million over that period.”
“CBO anticipates that rescinding those funds would result in fewer enforcement actions over the next decade and in a reduction in revenue collections,” Swagel wrote.
Changing some work requirements and expanding eligibility for SNAP would increase federal spending by $2.1 billion while changes to TANF would reduce it by $5 million, according to CBO.
The section of the bill that rescinds or claws back $27.1 billion in COVID-19 budget authority would reduce federal spending outlays by $11 billion during the 10-year budget window, according to CBO.
The majority of those funds, CBO said, “would come from the Public Health and Social Service Emergency Fund and from certain infrastructure and disaster relief programs.”
The Congressional Research Service explains that budget authority “allows federal agencies to incur obligations, such as entering into contracts, employing personnel, and submitting purchase orders” while outlays “represent the actual payment of these obligations, usually in the form of electronic transfers or checks issued by the Treasury Department.”
Overall, CBO said, the debt limit package would reduce the deficit by $1.5 trillion during the next decade.
Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, a New York Democrat, said Wednesday morning that senators should prepare to vote quickly on the package after it arrives from the House.
“I cannot stress enough that we have no margin for error,” Schumer said. “Either we proceed quickly and send this bipartisan agreement to the president’s desk, or the federal government will default for the first time ever.”
Schumer indicated during an afternoon press conference he might not allow amendment votes that some Republicans have been calling for in order to allow the bill to move quickly to final passage.
“We can’t send anything back to the House. That would risk default,” Schumer said.
Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen warned last week that the country could begin a default on June 5 without a new debt limit law.
A default would have prevented the federal government from borrowing any more money to pay all of the country’s bills in full and on time. That would have meant delayed payments for hundreds of federal programs, including military paychecks, Social Security and Medicare. It also would have negatively impacted the global economy.
Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, a Kentucky Republican, said once the debt limit package reaches that chamber, he’ll “be proud to support it without delay.”
McConnell, however, expressed disappointment with the caps on defense spending, saying it was the “worst part of the deal.”
“I don’t think it’s as good as I would like,” McConnell said. “But if you look at the totality of the agreement, I think, it should be supported and our defense needs will still be there.”
McConnell said his hope is that if senators who want amendment votes are given those votes, they would yield back time, allowing the chamber to vote on final passage Thursday or Friday.
After that vote, the package will go to President Joe Biden for his signature.
Zinke and Rosendale on the debt deal
Montana’s two members of the United States House of Representatives both voted against the debt deal.
On Twitter, Rep. Ryan Zinke, who represents the western district of the state, had a thread of Tweets about why he voted against the bill, while complimenting House Speaker Kevin McCarthy, R-California.
“The bill was not all bad. It contained modest but needed updates on energy permitting reforms and it negotiated spending reductions, but it is just not enough for Montana,” Zinke said. “We are faced with adding $4 trillion in debt. More must be done to cut the budget and grow the economy.”
In a late-night posting on Twitter from Montana’s other Congressional member, Rep. Matt Rosendale said he opposed the additional debt.
“Unfortunately, we had a bad night for America. 149 Republicans joined 165 Democrats to add an additional $4 trillion to our national debt – an absolute insult to the American people,” he said.
Moreover, he chided fellow Republicans for supporting the McCarthy-backed measure, calling it a “return to Swamp conditions.”
“If there was nothing in the Fiscal Irresponsibility Act for Democrats, how is it that more of them (165) voted for the bill than Republicans (149)? Biden and (U.S. House Minority Leader Hakeem) Jeffries are still celebrating,” he said.
That followed the same talking points the U.S. House Freedom Caucus used on social media:
“All Republicans should oppose the Biden-McCarthy debt limit deal. Period. There is not a single provision in this legislation that justifies a $4+ trillion debt limit increase to 1/1/2025. #NoDeal. Back to the negotiating table.”
